What Tides Canada and the Fraser Institute have in common
If you haven't heard by now, I'll tell you - The Canadian Revenue Agency is auditing Tides Canada and its charitable status.
This is the logical extention of calling certain unnamed charitable organizations money launderers and radicals.
Tides Canada and other charities do what countless other charitable organizations do. They follow the rules of the CRA in dispensing their funds and providing tax receipts.
This type of harassment is a slippery slope which is why an organization like Imagine Canada - an organization that is as vanilla as they come - issued a letter to Environment Minister Peter Kent and Prime Minister Stephen Harper urging them to retract and apologize for their vague statements about money laundering charities.
Whether you agree or disagree with the eventual recipients and purposes of those funds I would encourage the citizens of Canada (perhaps Vivian Krause) to train their high powered research skills to the money funneled towards institutions like the Fraser Institute or the Canadian Constitution Foundation. Because I'm positive, if I had three months to spare, I could dig through the books of those organizations and come up with some interesting definitions of funds being used for "political purposes".
By any reasonable (or unreasonable) interpretation of Canadian tax law any institution that does any political advocacy whatsoever could easily be defined as having used more than ten percent of its funds for nefarious "political purposes". LOL you say? Let's take a walk down Canada Revenue Act Way shall we. The definition of political purposes in the Canada Revenue Act is pretty broad. To wit "Political purpose — The courts consider the following to be political purposes:• to support a political party or candidate for public office; or
• to seek to retain, oppose, or change the law or policy or decisions of any level of government in Canada or a foreign country."TO SEE TO CHANGE THE LAW OR POLICY OR DECISIONS OF ANY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT IN CANADA. Wait a second, what's this I found here? Why, it's the mission statement of the Fraser Institute. "Our vision is a free and prosperous world where individuals benefit from greater choice, competitive markets, and personal responsibility.
Our mission is to measure, study, and communicate the impact of competitive markets and government interventions on the welfare of individuals."
Emphasis mine.
I wonder if "government interventions" have anything to do with law, policy or decisions at any level of government?And look at this. It seems that if you donate to the Fraser Institute you get a charitable tax receipt. "The benefits of becoming a donor
By donating to the Fraser Institute, you are supporting talented people, leading research, and widespread impact.
All supporters receive:
• The Fraser Institute's annual report
• Fraser Frontline (quarterly newsletter)
• Charitable receipts in accordance with Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)"
Good to know that little bit about IRS tax receipts. It's a funny thing. The US, just like Canada, issues tax receipts for people who donate to charities who do work outside of their home country.
In fact, for a measly $5000 to $9,999 I can become a member of the Chairman's Circle. I receive all the benefits of the Executive Circle and special Chairman's Circle invitation and access to renowned speakers and Institute leaders.Call now...
_________________
I write this in support of the BlackOut SpeakOut campaign. I would encourage you to join a committed group of organizations representing millions of Canadians. Let your MPs know that you will not stand for this aggression (had to end it with a Big Lebowski quote).
_______________
Really important disclaimer - I am not a tax lawyer. Feel free to correct me in the comments. I seek knowledge.


